|
Aalto E, et al. Comparison of terbutaline Turbuhaler and albuterol chlorofluorocarbon
(CFC) inhaler in middle-aged and elderly patients with obstructive lung
disease. Ann Allergy 1992;69:33-6.
Ahlström H, et al. Treatment of asthma in pre-school children with
inhalation of terbutaline in Turbuhaler compared with Nebuhaler. Allergy
1989;44:515-8.
Anani A, et al. Breath-actuated inhalers: comparison of Turbohaler with
salbutamol Rotahaler. Eur Respir J 1989;2:640-2.
Boe J, et al. New method of evaluating patient preference for different
inhalation delivery systems. Ann Allergy 1992;68:255-60.
Brown PH, et al. Breath-actuated inhalers in chronic asthma: comparison
of Diskhaler and Turbohaler for delivery of beta-agonists. Eur Respir
J 1992;5:1143-5.
Corris PA, et al. The efficacy and acceptability of two breath-actuated,
multi-dose, dry-powder inhalers in the treatment of chronic asthma. Br
J Clin Res 1992;3:139-50.
Duncan J, et al. Clinical assessment of a new multidose nonpressurised
metered-dose inhaler. Drug Invest 1990;2:136-7.
Engel T, et al. Clinical comparison of inhaled budesonide delivered either
via pressurized metered dose inhaler or Turbuhaler. Allergy 1989;44:220-5.
Gioulekas D, et al. A comparison of the clinical efficacy and patient
acceptability of terbutaline Turbuhaler and salbutamol Rotahaler, in adult
patients with asthma. Respir Med 1996;90:205-9.
Harvey J, Williams JG. Randomised cross-over comparison of five inhaler
systems for bronchodilator therapy. Br J Clin Pract 1992;46:249-51.
Hultquist C, et al. A double-blind comparison between a new multi-dose
powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) and metered dose inhaler in children with
asthma. Allergy 1989;44:467-70.
Lindsay DA, et al. A multicentre comparison of the efficacy of terbutaline
Turbuhaler and salbutamol pressurized metered dose inhaler in hot, humid
regions. Eur Respir J 1994;7:342-5.
Nieminen MM, Lahdensuo A. Inhalation treatment with budesonide in asthma.
A comparison of Turbuhaler and metered dose inhalation with Nebuhaler.
Acta Ther 1995;21:179-92.
Nimmo CJ, et al. Assessment of patient acceptance and inhalation technique
of a pressurized aerosol inhaler and two breath-actuated devices. Ann
Pharmacother 1993;27:922-7.
O'Gorman PL, et al. Dry powder inhalation devices: consumer perceptions
of two new devices. N Z Fam Phys 1990;49:182-3.
Oldæus G, et al. Comparison of Bricanyl Turbuhaler and Ventolin
Rotahaler in children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995;74(Suppl
8):34-7.
Osterman K, et al. A multiple dose powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) compared
with a conventional aerosol - an acceptance study in asthmatics. Allergy
1989;44:294-7.
Pedersen S. Effect of terbutaline sulphate Turbuhaler in children with
exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. In: Newman SP, Morén F, Crompton
GK, eds. A new concept in inhalation therapy. London: Medicom, 1987:146-50.
Petrie GR, et al. An assessment of the acceptability of two breath-actuated
corticosteroid inhalers. Comparison of Turbohaler with Diskhaler. Drug
Invest 1990;2:129-31.
Repper J, et al. The accuracy of asthmatic children's drug usage records
using two breath-actuated dry-powder inhalers. Br J Clin Res 1994;5:147-55.
Tjwa MK. Budesonide inhaled via Turbuhaler: a more effective treatment
for asthma than beclomethasone dipropionate via Rotahaler. Ann Allergy
Asthma Immunol 1995;75:107-11.
Vilsvik JS, et al. Comparison of the acceptability of the Ventolin metered-dose
inhaler and the Bricanyl Turbuhaler. Ann Allergy 1993;70:300-4.
Warner JO, Chetcuti P. Efficacy and acceptability of terbutaline sulphate
Turbuhaler in children. In: Newman SP, Morén F, Crompton GK, eds.
A new concept in inhalation therapy. London: Medicom, 1987:166-72.
Welch MJ, et al. Comparison of patient preference and ease of teaching
inhaler technique for Pulmicort Turbuhaler versus pressurized metered-dose
inhalers. J Aerosol Med 2004;17(2):129-39.
Zellweger JP, et al. Efficacy and tolerance of terbutaline and budesonide
administered via a pressurized aerosol inhaler or a Turbuhaler® in
asthmatic patients. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1993;82:561-4.
|